快讯 中共向美国开战 谷歌宣布与共决裂 更新中

我们的特殊性和贵公司以前对我们“政审”

08年的512汶川大地震，我们覆盖了大陆媒体不报道的资讯，结果网站访问量翻倍。今年5月下旬到6月中被贵公司停掉广告前的几周内，由于邓玉娇事件， 8 9 6 4二十周年，石首事件，江胡斗/政法系广东官场大地震，绿坝/反绿坝等5大事件的叠加效应，我们网站的海内外访问量激增，在一到二周内接近翻倍。同期自邓玉娇事件后，我们技术人员义工也有了一些时间，将广告从文字改为图片，从右侧的一条增到网页最后位置的三条，位置和图片带来对读者的冲击力。在访问量和广告的双重加强下，同期广告会有3倍的成长，对于我们来说，是在情理之中。

 

第一封电邮，AD Sense 负责先生或女士好,

我们在4月24日收到您的批准通知, 但一直到现在也没有收到贵部分的"另一份通知". 请您帮助查询情况. 我一向认为贵公司很有效率,
这次的申请让我很意外, 希望我是多心了, 毕竟这是美国, 应没有政审问题.

谢谢.


第二封电邮，AD Sense 负责先生或女士好,

因为我们的申请被批准后， 一直没有收到"嵌入程序"的通知，我多次发电子信件给贵部门，但如石沉大海，看来我的担心不是没有道理。

贵公司是美国公司，不应受中国共产党的影响，现用《世界人权宣言》和你们共勉：《世界人权宣言》第19条说：人人有权享有主张和发表意见的自由；此项权利包括持有主张而不受干涉的自由，和通过任何媒介和不论国界寻求、接受和传递消息和思想的自由。

我们网站同仁希望贵部门和个人能站在人民一边，而不是站在独裁政权一边。你们是在作历史选择。希望你们的良心和后代不会蒙羞。当历史走过这一页，你们可以为今日的决定感到自豪。

由多伦多、哈佛法学院、牛津和剑桥研究团体所组成的开放网络促进会（Open Net Initiative），在一个网路过滤研究中发现：

调查证据指以下国家有网路过滤行为：阿塞拜然（Azerbaijan）、巴林（Bahrain）、缅甸（Burma/Myanmar）、中国、衣索匹亚（Ethiopia）、印度、伊朗、约旦、利比亚（Libya）、摩洛哥（Morocco）、阿曼（Oman）、巴基斯坦、沙乌地阿拉伯（Saudi
Arabia）、新加坡、南韩、苏丹、叙利亚（Syria）、塔吉克斯坦（Tajikistan）、泰国、突尼斯（Tunisia）、阿拉伯联合酋长国（UAE），土库曼斯坦（Turkmenistan），乌兹别克斯坦（Uzbekistan）、越南（Vietnam）和也门（Yemen）。

https://www.aboluowang.com/news/data/2007/0519/article_21772.htm

盼望你们为自己和大陆人民的未来作出正确选择。

 

附件2：

Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that what at first appeared to be solely a security incident--albeit a significant one--was something quite different.

First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses--including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors--have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.

Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users' computers.

We have already used information gained from this attack to make infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and to update their web browsers. Always be cautious when clicking on links appearing in instant messages and emails, or when asked to share personal information like passwords online. You can read more here about our cyber-security recommendations. People wanting to learn more about these kinds of attacks can read this U.S. government report (PDF), Nart Villeneuve's blog and this presentation on the GhostNet spying incident.

We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate about freedom of speech. In the last two decades, China's economic reform programs and its citizens' entrepreneurial flair have lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty. Indeed, this great nation is at the heart of much economic progress and development in the world today.

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that "we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China."

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered--combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web--have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.